Re: Idea : common dir and tree (Rep:Re: Why not create packages?)

[Guylhem Aznar <guylhem@metalab.unc.edu>]

On Thu, Jul 20, 2000 at 10:35:27AM -0300, Jorge Godoy wrote:
> I agree with you on this. I think we should keep /usr/share/HOWTO. If
> you must include a LDP directory, it might be /usr/share/HOWTO/LDP (in
> this case we might also have /usr/share/HOWTO/OSWG). 

For less than 10 OSWG HOWTOs already included in the LDP?
Useless effort. Let's put everything in /usr/share/HOWTO/ without any
LDP subdir

>     Stein> It might be an idea to make allowances for /opt/OSWG
>     Stein> appearing.
> 
> I think that we should keep compatibility with them, but it's not an
> obbligation to keep the same structures for both groups. The ideal

Yup. /usr/share/HOWTO/ + /opt/ldp seems fine.

If write HOWTO, we can process them and include them along.
If they process them by themselves and want to install them somewhere
else, they can consider /opt/oswg

-- 
Guylhem P. Aznar                               http://www.linuxdoc.org
guylhem \@/ metalab.unc.edu                    http://www.iMedecin.com
"They who can give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary
safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety."  -----  Benjamin Franklin


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to ldp-discuss-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org