[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Critique of draft GNU Free Documentation License v1.0

To: poet@linuxports.com
Subject: Re: Critique of draft GNU Free Documentation License v1.0
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2000 00:13:46 -0700 (MST)
Cc: ldp-discuss@lists.linuxdoc.org
In-reply-to: <387D8EDE.60F666@linuxports.com> (message from Joshua Drake onThu, 13 Jan 2000 00:37:50 -0800)
References: <20000107122249.A193@localhost> <200001080728.AAA06968@aztec.santafe.edu> <20000110224531.A138@localhost> <200001120557.WAA11707@aztec.santafe.edu> <387C1B1F.F7598828@linuxports.com> <200001130639.XAA13096@aztec.santafe.edu> <387D8EDE.60F666@linuxports.com>
Reply-to: rms@gnu.org
Resent-cc: recipient list not shown: ;
Resent-date: 14 Jan 2000 07:13:56 -0000
Resent-from: ldp-discuss@lists.debian.org
Resent-message-id: <b-wtsC.A.6VF.0ysf4@murphy>
Resent-sender: ldp-discuss-request@lists.debian.org

    I don't see the LDP as encouraging to do either.

When the LDP recommends a license that includes the notification
requirement, that is quite a strong form of encouragement.

I would therefore like to ask the LDP to change this policy, and stop
specifically encouraging the use of such a clause.


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to ldp-discuss-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

References:
- Critique of draft GNU Free Doucumentation License v1.0
  - From: <dave@lafn.org>
- Re: Critique of draft GNU Free Doucumentation License v1.0
  - From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
- Re: Critique of draft GNU Free Documentation License v1.0
  - From: David Lawyer <dave@lafn.org>
- Re: Critique of draft GNU Free Documentation License v1.0
  - From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
- Re: Critique of draft GNU Free Documentation License v1.0
  - From: Joshua Drake <poet@linuxports.com>
- Re: Critique of draft GNU Free Documentation License v1.0
  - From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
- Re: Critique of draft GNU Free Documentation License v1.0
  - From: Joshua Drake <poet@linuxports.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Linux Documentation E-Commerce Store Proposal From Talinda Incorporated
Next by Date: Re: Critique of draft GNU Free Documentation License v1.0
Previous by thread: Re: Critique of draft GNU Free Documentation License v1.0
Next by thread: Re: Critique of draft GNU Free Documentation License v1.0
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread