[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Boilerplate License Revision Proposal

To: ldp-discuss@lists.linuxdoc.org, ldp-discuss@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Boilerplate License Revision Proposal
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2000 15:25:02 -0600 (MDT)
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0007221924340.1278-100000@crazypenguins.commandprompt.com>(message from Poet/Joshua Drake on Sat, 22 Jul 2000 19:26:47 -0700(PDT))
References: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0007221924340.1278-100000@crazypenguins.commandprompt.com>
Reply-to: rms@gnu.org
Resent-date: Mon, 24 Jul 2000 17:24:43 -0400 (EDT)
Resent-from: ldp-discuss@lists.debian.org
Resent-message-id: <4jd6-D.A.9m.1QLf5@murphy>
Resent-sender: ldp-discuss-request@lists.debian.org

I would like to ask the LDP as an entity to urge people not to use
option B if they use the Open Publication License for LDP documents.
With a small change in policy, you can make sure that all LDP documents
fit the Free Software Movement's standards of freeness.



--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to ldp-discuss-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Follow-Ups:
- Licensing.
  - From: Poet/Joshua Drake <poet@linuxports.com>

References:
- Re: Boilerplate License Revision Proposal
  - From: Poet/Joshua Drake <poet@linuxports.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Boilerplate License Revision Proposal
Next by Date: Re: Idea : common dir and tree (Rep:Re: Why not create packages?)
Previous by thread: Re: Boilerplate License Revision Proposal
Next by thread: Licensing.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread