[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: General Positive Feedback re: revision of site (fwd)

To: ldp-discuss@lists.linuxdoc.org
Subject: Re: General Positive Feedback re: revision of site (fwd)
From: bf347@lafn.org (David Lawyer)
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 1999 08:42:44 -0700
Reply-to: bf347@lafn.org
Resent-cc: recipient list not shown: ;
Resent-date: 30 Sep 1999 15:43:08 -0000
Resent-from: ldp-discuss@lists.debian.org
Resent-message-id: <Royz3.A.9JH.LU483@murphy>
Resent-sender: ldp-discuss-request@lists.debian.org



Terry Dawson wrote:
>Is there any good reason why we can't use the OpenSource Definition?

Yes.  First, it's for software, not docs.  But mainly it does not require 
that licenses be free.  It doesn't even have a requirement that a license 
must permit one to make copies.  If you cant copy it, you can't even put 
in on a website.	
			David Lawyer 



--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to ldp-discuss-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Follow-Ups:
- Re: General Positive Feedback re: revision of site (fwd)
  - From: "David Wheeler" <dwheeler@ida.org>

Prev by Date: Re: General Positive Feedback re: revision of site (fwd)
Next by Date: Manifesto_overview
Previous by thread: Re: General Positive Feedback re: revision of site (fwd)
Next by thread: Re: General Positive Feedback re: revision of site (fwd)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread