[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Treatment (Was Re: Debian Doc Project and LDP)

To: C Polisher <cpolish@ns.net>
Subject: Re: Treatment (Was Re: Debian Doc Project and LDP)
From: Adam Di Carlo <adam@onshore.com>
Date: 26 Sep 1999 15:53:45 -0400
Cc: ldp-discuss@lists.linuxdoc.org
In-reply-to: C Polisher's message of "Sun, 26 Sep 1999 11:47:41 -0700"
References: <oar9jmcjva.fsf@burrito.onshore.com> <37EE6A4D.DD5CE389@ns.net>
Resent-cc: recipient list not shown: ;
Resent-date: 26 Sep 1999 19:53:35 -0000
Resent-from: ldp-discuss@lists.debian.org
Resent-message-id: <b0kjH.A.eiF._mn73@murphy>
Resent-sender: ldp-discuss-request@lists.debian.org
Sender: apharris@burrito.onshore.com
User-agent: Gnus/5.070096 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.96) Emacs/20.3

C Polisher <cpolish@ns.net> writes:

> When informational items are classified by 
> _treatment_, searchers can quickly locate 
> desired information. Treatment would be an 
> element explaining the type of coverage 
> that the material provides, picked from a
> list. 

Very interesting idea.  I wonder how it would fit in with the DC
entity set.

BTW, anyone know some good RDF and DC mail lists to subscribe to?

--
.....Adam Di Carlo....adam@onShore.com.....<URL:http://www.onShore.com/>


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to ldp-discuss-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Treatment (Was Re: Debian Doc Project and LDP)
  - From: C Polisher <cpolish@ns.net>

References:
- Debian Doc Project and LDP -- hail and well-met
  - From: Adam Di Carlo <adam@onshore.com>
- Treatment (Was Re: Debian Doc Project and LDP)
  - From: C Polisher <cpolish@ns.net>

Prev by Date: why sgmltools being unmaintained isn't so much of a problem
Next by Date: Re: Treatment (Was Re: Debian Doc Project and LDP)
Previous by thread: Treatment (Was Re: Debian Doc Project and LDP)
Next by thread: Re: Treatment (Was Re: Debian Doc Project and LDP)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread